There are 2 Acronyms that Harvard MBAs (and UT MBAs) learn: POCD and SWAT. They both boil down to "Pro and Con" type thinking... but they both also add something useful.
POCD = People, Opportunity, Context, and Deal.
P - Are the people likely to be able to succeed (the right people)
O - Is the opportunity big... (how big is it)... (how much money might be made?)
C - What is happening in context of the world at large that is or MIGHT effect this opportunity?
D - How much money will it take to get to success, and what are the terms and risks?
I often use POCD to look at 2 different opportunities, I use a 1-10 scale to compare them... here is an example:
Karmaback
P - 9 (my team rocks)
O - 7 (its tough to make money in social right now)
C - 10 (Social is heating up and people are looking for our solution: how to make money with Social Marketing)
D - 8 (not a lot of funds needed)
SCORE: 34
--- vs. ---
Making my own social game (something I'd like to do someday)
P - 5 (I have no artistic talents)
O - 4 (hard to make money with just 1 game)
C - 7 (social games are hot)
D - 7 (not a lot of money needed to make a social game)
SCORE: 23 (better than I thought it would be)
SWOT is very similar, and does add a valuable concept (that POCD doesn't directly address)
SWOT = Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
I don't directly use SWOT, but I do like the thought of "threats" as part of the "Context" in the POCD framework.
So, the next time you are asked, is this a good idea?
Give them a POCD score. It's fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment